Quick Contact

Name
Phone
Email
Interest
Submit Form

Need a site safety review or safety audit? What can Safety Resources, Inc. do for your business?

Click here to request a free in-depth quote or use our contact form to request more information about the safety consulting and training services that we provide.

Or, call us:
800-641-5990.

READ / DOWNLOAD
our Safety Bulletins and Articles

Setting the Stage for Safety

New Year Offers Opportunity for Policy Changes - by Robert Baldwin
The beginning of each year presents a unique opportunity to start over with a fresh resolve for a new beginning. Now is the time to set a tone, a direction, a new policy that will not be seen as a midstream course correction or inexplicable random change.

It is a perfect time to reflect on problems of the past year and focus energy on improvements. Regulatory paperwork offers an easy tool for doing just that. At the end of December 2005 your business recorded (or should have recorded) the last of any accidents or injuries on the OSHA 300 Log. This official U.S. Department of Labor form is an official record of the safety performance of your firm.

Official filing rules now require that a corporate officer sign the document in order to close the year-end performance. Now is an excellent time to review the rules for recordability before executing this official document. The requirement for an employee posting of the document will become necessary in February.

Logging the results
Once reviewed and executed, the OSHA 300 Log becomes a powerful measuring stick for setting performance expectations for the upcoming year. A 300 Log with no injuries is an occasion for congratulations and encouragement to continue the good work, while a 300 Log filled with recordable accidents and injuries presents an occasion to set aggressive goals to improve safety.

All companies large and small can use this technique to set goals.

Once identified, the next step is to ensure that a policy and program are in place to provide employees with work rules and procedures. If injuries exist, for example, are there formal methods of preventing them? For instance, sprains and strains may indicate a need for mechanical lifting equipment or a new procedure that eliminates the hazard exposure, such as a requirement for “two-person” lifting of heavy items.

Assistance available
Sound a little overwhelming for the staff resources available? Not to worry as Indiana’s OSHA program (known as IOSHA) has an assistance program for employers. One of the first priorities of Indiana Commissioner of Labor Miguel Rivera was to revitalize the former BuSET (Bureau of Safety Education and Training).

Since his appointment, Rivera has dusted off the data the state has collected over the past several years and analyzed the accident and injury trends. He has on several occasions stated that IOSHA knows where the problems are and the areas in which the injuries are occurring. He has stated that participation to improve accident and injury rates is much preferred to the issuance of citations.

Targeting punitive enforcement actions at companies in which accidents are most likely to occur is a method widely used in federal OSHA jurisdictions. Critics of state managed plans point to comparisons of accident and injury rates in federal vs. state programs. One look at the graph clearly shows that while accident and injury rates are showing progressive improvement, Indiana (a state-managed OSHA program) is not doing as well as Illinois (a federal-managed OSHA program). Comparisons such as this weaken the argument for state control of compliance programs and give rise to speculations of planned citation actions.

One example of increased punitive actions to encourage workplace safety is occurring in the state of Florida. Faced with a large and growing number of workplace injuries and fatalities, the Southeast region has begun “saturation enforcement inspections.” This is a process in which additional OSHA compliance inspectors from as far away as Alabama are brought into Florida to conduct dozens of random inspections in an effort to place direct punitive pressure on all employers in the area. There is even evidence to suggest that Florida OSHA has shared citation information with local media, causing a broad communication of one company’s safety status and resulting in some embarrassment.

There is no concern that such measures will ever be utilized in Indiana’s state plan, although the focus and frequency of punitive fines from the IOSHA compliance officers ultimately will be determined by our own efforts to create and enforce a “safe” place in which to work.
Author: Robert Baldwin is CEO of Safety Resources, Inc. in Zionsville, Indiana. The team of consultants works in the structure and implementation of workplace safety, corporate loss control and regulatory compliance programs. Baldwin can be contacted at (317) 871-8155.

BizVoice/Indiana Chamber – January/February 2006
Reprinted with permission.